Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0429

reference
414-tree-1
name
0429
tree-preservation-order

undefined

414-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022050 50.890952)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.021979 50.890944,-1.021982 50.890958,-1.021992 50.890971,-1.022008 50.890981,-1.022027 50.890987,-1.022049 50.890990,-1.022071 50.890988,-1.022091 50.890981,-1.022107 50.890972,-1.022118 50.890959,-1.022121 50.890945,-1.022118 50.890931,-1.022108 50.890919,-1.022093 50.890909,-1.022073 50.890902,-1.022051 50.890900,-1.022029 50.890902,-1.022009 50.890908,-1.021993 50.890918,-1.021983 50.890930,-1.021979 50.890944)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL